Random Thoughts

Because random is really what I do best, here’s some randomness…

Posting here has been light and random of late. When I say of late, I really mean for the last several months. That said, the next couple of weeks will be light. I’m off to California for a high school reunion and to visit family. My focus is away from blogging and the net. And yes, I’ll have two laptops, a Blackberry and a cell phone with me. All quite capable of net stuff. But my focus will be elsewhere. You, my dear readers (all three of you), are important to me, but reality in the real world is more important. And all three of you know that already.

Ok, that was self deprecating, because I know there are actually more than three of you. I also know that those of you I exchange email, comments or conversation with know that real life is more important because you continually demonstrate your engagement with those more important real life things yourselves. For all of us, reality is more important that what happens online, although more and more I see folks I’ve read and talked to acting like the net is actually important.

Blogging. Tagging. A-list. Linking. The pecking order in the school yard. That’s how important it all is. All the blogging foofooraw is almost as important as being picked first for kickball on the playground back so many years ago. And it saddens me to see so many people I like and respect placing so much emphasis, or more importantly burning so many brain cells, over something so unimportant.

This realization has saddened me in a way that I can’t truly share here. Well, I can but I won’t. But I will explain. My blogroll over on the right side really represents two things. First and foremost, there’s my personal A-list…A for Affinity. Those are folks I feel some kinship with for a variety of reasons. Friends, co-workers, people I’ve developed a kinship with online. But I’ve been pretty involved in this blog crap since 2001 really. And I’ve seen people go from unknown strangers, to regular reads, to online friends of sorts to irrelevant, to annoying, to gone. My blogroll rarely openly denotes that. But I’ve noticed it personally as I weed people out of my RSS aggregator. That’s where it’s noticeable. Someone mentions Scoble and I realize I quit reading him a long time ago because regardless of what the noise says, he hasn’t said anything I found relevant in a long time. Noise for the sake of noise. I like Robert. I like him a lot when he blogs the human side of Robert. But that faded away and he became just another shrill voice shrieking the party line. Blogging isn’t hot. It isn’t a phenomena. Tags don’t matter. Microsoft is irrelevant (sorry Bill, but your big megalithic company is as irrelevant as AT&T was in 1998). Big companies, like elephants, just take a while to die.

Robert isn’t alone, and my singling him out wasn’t personal. There are a lot of what have been, over time, highly visible, highly respected folks that I’ve read. Many I’ve had personal conversations with. Some I know in person…yes, real life, who’ve become just irrelevant. And I know it will annoy some of you to read it, but get over the Cluetrain. The train derailed long ago. I’m sorry but folks, the trains has left the station. It’s long gone. It’s off the tracks. It’s history. And repeating the same shrill message years later is preaching to the choir. And some of us choir members are just sick of hearing the same sad tune, even if it’s some new convert who drank the koolaid singing. No I won’t name names, but how many of you have heard the same, offtimes shrill. voices, singing the same tune, repeating the same message, for just too damn long. Think stupid network. Think cluetrain. Think the market is the message. I’m sorry, but dammit, y’all gor boring as heck and haven’t said anything worth listening too for too damn long. Now if you say something interesting, I’ll have to hear it somewhere else because you’ve driven me to quit listening to your spouting the same crap day in and day out.

What pleases me far more, is the new encounters. Finding Tommi’s blog through the coincidental connection with Mary. Leaping from there on to Six More Months, where I read every day, but realize he hasn’t even made my blogroll here (shame on me…fixing that now). Learning today that a co-worker I respect greatly wandered the net and found my humble site here completely unknown to me was more exciting than inciting the /.-ers to link for me personally.

I’ve read a lot lately, too much, about men linking men (again…yawn), A-listers giving charity links to newcomers, ratings and rankings (rapings and pillaging?), ad nauseum. I don’t read your blogroll any more. I doubt you read mine. Where do I find new people to read? I wander comment links. Some of the people who read this draw comments in from far and wide sources. I look to see who read something on Shelley’s blog. I follow a link to a commenter’s blog. Then follow a comment to a link on their blog.

Think of the old six degrees of separation to Kevin Bacon game. Or Will Smith if you liked the movie. I find myself, in my spare reading time, trying to reach 4 to 6 degrees of separation away to find someone new. And there are lots of somone new-s out there.

Is there a reason for this? I’m not sure. The blog circle has become so inbred, so nepotistic, so closed that I find it terribly unappealing once I cross past my small affinity group circle. For me, when I read, I go looking for new and interesting. And the people who once were interesting (I started listing names, but respect drove me to backspace) are often boring now. I don’t take enough time to point to new voices, or link to them. To me, it’s becoming more important to interact with them. Comments, email, and sometimes blog posts, but the blogging bubble has burst. The next big thing in blogging will not be blogging. We have passed the apogee folks, but we’re not in orbit, and this time, what goes around isn’t coming back around.

We need to think about new things.

4 Responses to “Random Thoughts”

  1. Harry
    August 11th, 2005 | 1:54 am

    This sounds like a digital version of social fatigue. I had a good talk with a friend last night on related topic: becoming ineffective as an advocate by sticking to the familiar. Given the number of good minds mulling over the human condition, there’s a chance someone may be working on what you’re looking for, or working on something that’s close enough. Meanwhile, here’s something I hope will interest you: The Manas Journal.

  2. Ken
    August 11th, 2005 | 12:56 pm

    I started to disagree, but you may be right Harry. What was, a few years ago, a dynamic and interesting community, has just progressed to new things at a different rate than I. The synergy that once existed feels stagnant and boring. In some cases, interests have simply diverged. It happens. I’m certainly busy and very engaged in some things that interest me. They just aren’t here on this blog and are more prominent in other circles.

    Thanks for the link to Manas. Some pertty fascinating reading there. I’m sure some of that will keep me reading and thinking for a while.

    Cheers!

  3. August 16th, 2005 | 8:49 am

    I sure know what you mean about the inbred, look-over-your-shoulder tendency of bloggers. And I’m glad to see Harry sending a link to MANAS your way. I thought myself almost alone in being thunderstruck by it and having blogged on my discovery of it and of THE MANAS READER, which I highly recommend snapping up via Amazon or Bookfinder or Half.com. Even the articles from its early days in the late 1940s are inspiring. And to think that its lone editor for over forty years chose anonymity over fame (he only printed his name when required on annual publisher’s statements, never over his articles), and with a circulation throughout of about 2,500! Hats off to the E.F. Schumacher Society for putting the entire four-decade run free online, and for issuing it *all* on CD for twenty bucks postpaid! I hope to reprint more articles from it on my site, as well as assemble links to the entire MANAS READER anthology of over one hundred pieces. Reading it has slowed my blogging down a great deal, and to it I say, to imitate Darrell Hammond’s imitation of Al Gore responding to an audience member’s question - “I thank you *for* it.”

  4. August 18th, 2005 | 3:29 pm

    Well Ken, you’ve pretty much nailed a lot of what I would be afraid to say. Okay maybe not afraid to say - I mean what is Doc Searls gonna do, beat me up? - but you know what I mean. And it’s not even Doc, but you know what I mean. But I have to disagree on one point. You’ve basicallly described, in your “way with the blogs” - following comments etc. - the way it ought to be, for lack of a better phrase. That something new may be something in fact quite old. Having a little bit of fun, the old back and forth to and fro thing. But I have to say that I have one large regret about blogging. That I haven’t met more bloggers. No wait. Haven’t met more of the people on my blogroll. Except for Harry. Whom I haven’t met. Harry scares me. Harry may be about twelve people he’s so damn bright. But let’s leave Harry out of it for a minute. He’ll be back in here soon enough. I have met physically a total of two blogggers, or as you more aptly (ych) put it, I’ve met two of the A list as in A for Affinity. I do regret this. Not the meeting of but the dearth of meetings. But there’s this thing called time and space. And money. The bloggers lament. So please don’t give up on blogging, or as it was put on the blogs by someone from the good side of the blogtracks, someone very dear to the spirit of the thing, I think, don’t give up on the good side of the blog tracks.

    Does that make sense? I hope not. The minute I start making sense we’re bag deep.

    The new thing? Mini-microblogging.